Steven Gustitis Attorney at Law  Bryan Texas

Board Certified - Criminal Law
Texas Board of Legal Specialization

218 NORTH MAIN
BRYAN, TEXAS 77803
979-823-9111

Free Initial
Consultation
979-823-9111

Phone Answered
24 hrs a Day

Thousands of
Cases Defended

Ineffective Assistance of Counsel

Several prospective clients called recently asking how they can appeal their Brazos County criminal conviction and sentence resulting from a plea bargain or an open plea to the court (a guilty plea and waiver without a punishment recommendation from the prosecutor). "With great difficulty," I said. A plea bargain accepted by the trial judge waives most of a defendant's rights to appeal. However, there are a few cracks in the armor which potential clients should be aware.

First, a defendant's waiver of rights and plea of guilty must be voluntary. That is, the person's plea must be knowingly and intelligently made. Furthermore, the trial judge must make this finding on the record. However, if a person received ineffective assistance of counsel leading to their decision to plead guilty and waive their rights, a good involuntary plea argument can be fashioned. In that case, the defendant's plea and waiver can be withdrawn and the defendant can start from square one defending the charges against them. There are many ways a criminal defense lawyer might provide ineffective assistance of counsel leading to an involuntary plea. Following are just a couple to consider.

The failure to investigate is a common basis for ineffective assistance of counsel. If the criminal trial lawyer failed to uncover facts about their client's case that, had the facts been known, would have created a "substantial likelihood" the defendant wouldn't have waived his rights but insisted upon a trial, can cause an involuntary plea. The failure to locate an alibi witness is an example of the failure to investigate. The failure to discover a prior conviction, being used to enhance punishment, was void or voidable, is another example.

Another instance of ineffective assistance is when the criminal lawyer provides their client incorrect advice on the law applicable to the case and that erroneous advice leads the client to plead guilty and waive their rights. One example might be where the client is charged with multiple counts of sexual assault upon a child. The trial lawyer tells their client "if you plead guilty and ask the judge to assess punishment the sentences cannot be stacked upon one another, but can only run concurrently." (WRONG!) The client pleads guilty, waives his rights, and the trial judge guts the client with stacked prison sentences. In short, the client's guilty plea was based on the erroneous advice of his lawyer. Had the advice been correct the client would have insisted upon jury trial. That's an involuntary plea.

Another common example of ineffective assistance is when the criminal defense attorney fails to communicate a plea bargain offer made by the prosecutor. Had the plea offer been communicated to the client, they would have accepted it. Although this is not an "involuntary plea" situation, it is yet another way to reverse a bad result for the client based on ineffective assistance of counsel.

Reversing a guilty plea and waiver is tough and technical legal work. Many times, if not most, the attempt is unsuccessful because of the great bias contained within the law toward the finality of convictions. However, a good Bryan|College Station criminal defense lawyer, experienced in appeals, can sometimes work the miracle a client needs for a second bite at the apple. But critical time limits often apply! Contact an experienced criminal appeal attorney immediately to discuss your case.



Stephen Gustitis - Attorney at Law Bryan TX

Print this page Print this page

© Copyright 2010 Stephen Gustitis. Attorney at Law. All Rights Reserved.
218 North Main
Bryan, Texas 77803
979-823-9111

This publication and the information included in it are not intended to serve as a substitute for consultation with an attorney. Specific legal issues, concerns and conditions always require the advice of appropriate legal professionals. The use of the Internet for communications with the firm will not establish an attorney-client relationship and messages containing confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent."

Website Designed by:
Web Unlimited
| Powered by: CopyWrite CMS